While enjoying power for many years, Congress glorified Gandhi family. India is suffering from the outcome of such glorification. If India has to progress, this chain of glorification should be broken. This Article takes a review of this fake glorification.
1. What has congress done in its regime other than glorification of Nehru family?
‘There is a picture of Nathuram on the front page in one issue. Does it not amount to glorification of Nathuram?’ A senior citizen had asked this question to us over phone. The word ‘glorification’ has become a matter of ridicule for patriotic Indians. It has been more than 60 years since India got independence and for most of this period, Congress has ruled this country. What has Congress done during its regime? Shaving for others? What else but ‘glorification’? Gandhi was made ‘Rashtrapita (father of the Nation)’, Nehru was made ‘Chacha’, Indira Gandhi ‘Iron Lady’, Rajeev Gandhi as ‘Strong Prime Minister’ and now Sonia Gandhi is made as ‘Rajmata’.
In this Maharashtra of valiant Sambhaji Maharaj, Rahul Gandhi is made as Prince by licking his boots.
2. Any foreign Chief is taken to first visit ‘Gandhi-sthal’, is it not glorification?
In this democratic country, why is Gandhi family being glorified? And who is doing it? Has this country become impotent? Many chiefs of foreign countries visit this country. The first thing that they are made to visit is ‘Hey Ram - sthal’. Flowers are offered on the mausoleum of Gandhi who is peacefully lying there. As if the Nation has no brave history, Congress takes visiting Chief of every country first to ‘Gandhi-sthal’. Is it not glorification? A valiant king like Chhatrapati Shivaraya was born in this country; why the foreign dignitaries are not taken to bow at his feet? Or is Gandhi greater than Chhatrapati? Who is superior? Chhatrapati or Gandhi? Swami Vivekananda or Gandhi? Subhashchandra Bose or Gandhi? Swatantryveer Savarkar who churned the wheel in Andaman or Gandhi?
3. Why Congressmen feel ‘Bibi Ka Makbara’ more sacred than the land of Bhagavan Srikrushna?
America’s President Obama visited India; he visited two main places in Delhi – one Gandhi’s encroached mausoleum and the other Bibi ka Makbara. Gandhi is still ok; but why Bibi ka Makbara? Or is it a conspiracy that henceforth, every visiting chief of foreign country should pay a visit to it ? What is this glorification? Or Congress Government wants to send a message to the world that India is an Islamic country? There is the birth place of Bhagavan Srikrushna very close by. A visit could have been arranged there? Or is Bibi ka Makbara more sacred than the birthplace? It is not the mistake of these eunuchs who are glorifying; but it is our, i.e. your and my mistake because we only elect these tramps to the throne to rule us.
Instead of naming the bridge after freedom-fighter, Savarkar, Congress named the Mumbai sea-link after Rajiv Gandhi who was elected as Prime Minister only because he was the son of Indira Gandhi !
4. Most Indians who pay visit to ‘Hey Ram’, the memorial of Gandhi show respect outwardly to his way of thinking; but abuse him otherwise
Who is superior, freedom-fighter Savarkar, who jumped in the sea at Marseilles due to his intense desire to reach his motherland, who was twice sentenced to punishment of deportation for 50 years, who was made to go round the wheel like an animal or Rajeev Gandhi? Most of the Indians who pay visit to ‘Hey Ram’, the memorial of Gandhi, show only outwardly respect to the principles advocated by Gandhi but curse him inside. Why do they curse him? It is because they have not been able to sleep soundly with the bitter memories of partition and the wounds inflicted on them. They are upset about the stories of huge massacre that took place after partition. Their minds are not yet stable due to the Hindu genocide by Muslims in Naukhali and raping of thousands of young women. They are disturbed by the sound of wailing of the Hindu brethren who were returning to secure India leaving their properties and everything behind when their train was attacked by Muslim Pathans and they were killed brutally. They curse Muslims remembering their cruelty when Muslims had banged heads of small children on walls and killed them. The highest pinnacle of Muslim culture was raping beautiful young Hindu women. After one Muslim used to rape a Hindu woman, he used to pass her on to another, then to third. They curse the weakness in begging of those women who went through hell. Few Hindu and Sikh women preferred self-immolation. The step taken by them to save their modesty was right. All the Congressmen responsible for partition were not least bothered about the injustice and oppression that followed. These curses are for lack of foresight in the leadership while accepting freedom of divided country. Now think, who is glorifying and whom? Only once the Hindu in this country needs to become wise and hand over the reins of this country to pro-Hindu leadership; then he would not sit quietly till he unearths the sins of Congressmen and drown them in Arabian Sea. Now it is enough of glorification. This Hindu will not have peace till he builds mausoleums of all these unworthy oppressors and escapists.
5. Nathuram, who had only welfare of Nation at heart, cannot be termed as traitor only because of killing Gandhi !
The one question is now left and it is glorification of Nathuram. Killing of Gandhi was the last chapter in Nathuram’s life; but what he did before for the welfare of the country, cannot be termed as his disloyalty. An active member of ‘Abhinav Bharat’, member of RSS, an Editor of a weekly periodical published from Sangli by Hindu Mahasabha were some of the activities of Nathuram in the interest of the country; therefore, he cannot be branded as traitor only because he killed Gandhi. Killing of Gandhi was a political murder. We cannot judge whether it was right or wrong at that time. After the cruel crime of partition, however, Indians have not been able to sleep soundly in the past 63 years due to the Pakistani Muslims. Don’t you think that those masterminds of partition are responsible for all these things? (‘Saptahik Rashtraparva’, 06. 12. 2010 )
No comments:
Post a Comment